Conservative Boot Camp

15 May

Obama and Foreign Policy

I wrote the following in a thread at American Thinker.com about Obama’s weakness in foreign policy matters.

I agree that the Obama camp is hypersensitive to foreign policy issues due to the weakness of BHO on these concerns. I find that one of BHO’s “credibility gaps”, especially on foreign policy results from his use of a large number of academics as advisory staff. These are not just people who work in academia, but also people who work in think tanks, mostly as policy wonks. They’re thinkers, not doers. Like BHO, they don’t like to get their hands dirty with the act of actually managing relations with foreign powers, they just want to advise others about how to do it. Since he’s mostly an academic himself, he is unaware of exactly how stuffy and elitist those academics sound to the average man or woman. What is logically consistent and makes perfect sense to academics doesn’t play well off-campus because it’s often impractical.

BHO, despite his claims that he’s traveled overseas and lived in Indonesia, hasn’t a clue as to how to conduct meaningful negotiations. The face-to-face meeting is usually an event that occurs deep into the process of negotiation, not at the first step. You hold that face-to-face meeting out as a carrot and use it to get your opponents to agree to preconditions. That’s were the real negotiations start. The face-to-face meeting between the leaders of two countries usually doesn’t occur until near the end of the process when both (or all) of them can use the outcome of that face-to-face meeting for their own political purposes back at home.

It’s sad that BHO has gotten as far along in the process as he has without the scrutiny from the media that would have made this all clear a long time ago. One of the changes to our process that needs to happen after this election cycle is over is for there to be a meaningful national dialog on the proper role of the press (radio, TV and print) in the election process. As a nation that is built upon the idea of free speech, I am embarrassed by this huge bias in the media for Obama. For one thing, individual news organisations have no business conducting sham debates that are thinly veiled opportunities for their favoured candidates to gather free publicity. Debates, by their very nature need to be conducted in a more even-handed and neutral manner than have been any of the roughly 25 debates that have occurred so far.

HRC has a point that she’s been given the short end of the stick by the media. For all of her shortcomings, she has a better idea of how to conduct foreign policy than does BHO. I would prefer her twisted brand of foreign relations to his, simply because she’s much less likely to get us all killed than he is.

15 May

About The Fairness Doctrine

I posted this over at Newsbusters.com in a thread about author Stephen King’s insult of military personnel and his failure to apologise for it.

Under it’s last incarnation, the FD consisted of those two or three minute “opposing point of view from responsible parties” pieces that were generally shown at the end of local newscasts. I’m sure that’s what the FCC would use as a model for the starting point of a resurrected FD.

Where it would get interesting is the lawsuits that would inevitably be filed by people and groups who were denied access to the airwaves because the station management deemed that they weren’t “responsible parties”, or that their “opposing point of view” wasn’t widely held in the community. That’s part of what happened last time around - radio and TV stations were sued routinely about their decisions and eventually the Supreme Court recognised that determining who is a “responsible party” and what is a “responsible opposing point of view” is an impossible task to thrust upon local station management. The whole system begs the question about how many differing points of view the station must accommodate, and how often.

The history of the FD dates to the late 1940’s when the broadcast media were much less developed than they are today. There were three TV networks, only large cities had more than three or four channels, commercial FM radio was in it’s infancy, heck even AM radio was only 25 years old. In many rural settings with a weekly paper, the single AM station was the only news outlet in town. The FD made much more sense in that context. Especially when you consider that 65% of our population was rural.

Today, your basic cable or satellite TV account brings you 100+ channels and somewhere near 93% of Americans have one or the other; the AM and FM radio dials are crowded and you can choose what opinions you wish to hear; 80%+ of Americans have access to internet news sources at home or at work. The need for an FD is highly questionable.

15 May

About Barack Hussein Obama And Religion

I posted this over at American Thinker.com. in a thread about BHO and religion.

It seems to me that the underlying problem here is not BHO’s religion per se, but rather the hypersensitivity to the civil political discourse that is necessary to vet any candidate for office. This is the direct result of the Political Correctness trends which are now completely out of control.

Obama is a thoroughly modern politician who relies on image and symbolism to gain his advantage. He cannot rely on substance because he has precious little of that. His record in the Illinois legislature is replete with more “Present” votes than “Yea” or “Nay” votes - he’s a man without a position, it would seem. When he talks “off the script”, he often blunders into errors of fact, errors of arrogance, errors of memory that show him for the shallow and contrived politician he is. He has wrapped himself in the hazy gauze of politically correct hypersensitivity in order to stifle any real questioning of his past or his politics. It is time that we as a society sounded off about the damage that political correctness has done to our culture and our ability to get the business of government done.

14 May

This Article Is A Must-Read

I generally enjoy and agree with Walter E. Williams opinions. Today, I found this article at Townhall.com. I strongly recommend that you read this. It’s all about how Congress has created the major problems that we’re experiencing today.

14 May

The Cruel Irony of Academia

College - that place that you go after high school to learn critical thinking and analysis skills, and where you go to gain advanced knowledge of a particular discipline in order to pursue a career in that field.

Well, that’s how it’s supposed to work. Sadly, in modern America, it doesn’t. Couple the fact that many college students see their college years as an opportunity to party and experiment with drugs and dangerous behaviour, with the fact that many college administrators and academics see their roles as agents of social change rather than as educators, and you end up with a colossal failure on the part of American colleges and universities to deliver the goods that we all expect them to deliver. Always havens of controversial and anti-”norm” thinking, since the 1960’s most colleges and universities in this country have become unabashedly liberal, hiring academics who seek to brainwash rather than teach, administration who support every oppressed group with a social axe to grind. I don’t think that you’d find a lot of people in this country who would dispute the fact that our colleges and universities are dominated by modern liberalism.

Now, there’s nothing wrong with presenting a point of view that diverges from that which society holds as dominant. Intellect isn’t developed through just accepting the prevailing views - it comes through honest questioning, critical analysis and through debate. People learn who they are philosophically by learning how to defend their points of view. Thought that is unchallenged is not nearly as robust as is thought that has been challenged and has survived the challenges. The problem is that when the vast majority of your professors and administrators come at you from one perspective there is precious little of that debate. By being as universally committed to modern liberalism as they are, colleges and universities have become the very evil that they sought to remedy - they have become monolithic, iconoclastic and unbending centers in which thought and actions are dictated and where free will is routinely discounted. Where is the diversity of opinion on the modern college campus? Where is the academic freedom to explore any topic or theory? Where has the ability to conduct dialog and debate gone?

A couple of recent events in the news have served to highlight the problem that we face with our centers of higher learning. The first it the firing of an administrator and the University of Toledo, Crystal Dixon. You can read about it here. Ms. Dixon had a column published in the local rag that was a rebuttal to an editorial written by the editor-in-chief of the same rag. The main point that she made is that homosexuals are not civil rights victims in the same way as are those whose civil rights are affected because of immutable characteristics such as gender and race. She believes that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice that people make and cited the number of homosexual people who have converted to a heterosexual life as evidence that it is a choice. Her argument is that things about you that you can change don’t deserve the same protection under the law that things about you that you can’t change. Oh, and she made a number of comments about her religion and how her religion sees homosexuality as something that is outside the realm of God’s law. Did I mention that Crystal Dixon is a black woman? Well, she is.

Ms. Dixon was the Associate VP of Human Resources for the University of Toledo, and although she made her comments as private citizen, the university suspended and eventually fired Ms. Dixon because she proffered an opinion that was outside the ‘accepted’ thought at that university. This is not an unusual circumstance. Colleges and universities have become increasingly intolerant of any divergence from their ‘party line’. This is extraordinarily ironic, because colleges and universities usually trumpet their tolerance for diverse points of view. And yet, when afforded the opportunity to embrace a Christian perspective, the University of Toledo rejected it. When given the chance to engage in support of the First Amendment, the University of Toledo chose not to support it. When provided with a moment to celebrate the position of a black woman who had risen to a moderately high rank in their organisation, the University of Toledo decided to cast her from the organisation instead.

Suffice it to say that the University of Toledo has reached the very pinnacle of hypocrisy - slapping down a black woman for speaking her mind as a citizen of the community. My, that’s a liberal action, isn’t it?

The other story that’s hit the news lately can be read here. It’s a piece in the Denver Post that outlines the efforts of the University of Boulder at Boulder to establish an endowed chair position called “Professor of Conservative Thought and Policy”. What is driving this effort is the observation of the Chancellor of the university that there is little intellectual diversity at UC Boulder. Of course, this initiative has sent off the usual howls of protest from the usual suspects. What’s new?

But, according to the Denver Post article:

Boulder is far from the only campus to recognize a leftward tilt to the ivory tower. National surveys have repeatedly shown that liberals dominate faculties at most four-year colleges. And conservative activists have grown more aggressive in demanding balance. A group called the Leadership Institute now sends field workers to scores of campuses each fall to train right-wing students to speak up. College administrators are beginning to respond.

Academics studying the trend cite Georgetown University’s recent hiring of former Central Intelligence Agency Director George Tenet.

And Stetson University in DeLand, Fla., kicked off a conservative lecture series with a talk by the now-deceased William F. Buckley Jr.

Well, more power to them and their efforts to provide some diversity of opinion on the college campus. It’s long overdue.

© 2008 Conservative Boot Camp | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

GPS Reviews and news from GPS Gazettewordpress logo